Replies: 26Views: 448

Battle 10 America at War to be extended

D1gN1tY (110 posts, Admin) at 9/7/2008 9:24 PM

Ok - we've received a lot of Private Messages and Chat Requests tonight concerning the Battle today/ this evening (understandably) - as the Clans involved did not get the usual 2nd (and final) battle Window.

Unfortunately, we've not been able to make the necessary amendments to the Battle window immediately as we have all (including techs) been off-site at a meeting, discussing our latest development plans for FBG (it's very exciting).

At present, it shows Battle 10 as concluded. However, this Battle will shortly be re-opened for next weekend for the final attack window.

We are sorry for any inconvenience!

Regards,

D1gN1tY

Reply To This

Replies: 1
RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended

by Dougle (738 posts) at 9/7/2008 9:36 PM

:(

atleast i got a week to sort out my politics :P

Reply To This
- No replies
  RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
  
  by Virtual (100 posts) at 9/7/2008 9:41 PM
  
  Too bad this happened... and a big advantage for some clans..... they know who Im talking about ;)
  
  Reply To This
Replies: 2
RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended

by GhostDog (68 posts) at 9/7/2008 9:45 PM

I was hoping to get it over and done with today. It sucks that it's next week, and no ones really gonna buy troops now because their so expensive for most of us.

Reply To This
- Replies: 1
  RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
  
  by Dougle (738 posts) at 9/7/2008 9:59 PM
  
  i can buy another 20K troups and still hav 3 mill plinks left over ;)
  
  Reply To This
  - No replies
    RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
    
    by Tallas (17 posts) at 9/8/2008 10:54 AM
    
    That won't do DJR much help next battle if NiF comes back. ;)
    
    Reply To This
Replies: 20
RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended

by Tallas (17 posts) at 9/8/2008 8:20 AM

It's OK Dignity, I know you guys try your best, and you also specified that FBG is beta. We will just have to wait for next sunday, no harm is done ;)

Reply To This
- Replies: 16
  RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
  
  by Virtual (100 posts) at 9/8/2008 2:03 PM
  
  There is only one problem..... When will you put the map on again so we can reorganize our armies and think about tactic? WoC does have some army that need replacing.....
  
  Reply To This
  - Replies: 15
    RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
    
    by Mart (125 posts) at 9/8/2008 10:51 PM
    
    it will be done at sunday at 22.00 then you can check everything again^^
    --
    To B or not to B.. what a Question?
    
    Reply To This
    - Replies: 14
      RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
      
      by Lexisflex (35 posts) at 9/9/2008 5:21 PM
      
      LEts just end this battle and start a new 1 :D
      
      Reply To This
      - Replies: 13
        RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
        
        by Dougle (738 posts) at 9/9/2008 8:26 PM
        
        NO!
        
        Reply To This
        
        Replies: 12
        RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
        
        by Tallas (17 posts) at 9/10/2008 11:19 AM
        
        LoLuMaD?
        
        Reply To This
        
        Replies: 11
        RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
        
        by Dougle (738 posts) at 9/10/2008 2:08 PM
        
        no i just want an hour to launch my troups at woc i dont wanna hav any troups left alive by end
        
        Reply To This
        
        Replies: 10
        RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
        
        by Tallas (17 posts) at 9/10/2008 5:41 PM
        
        Well the least they can do is to keep this battle hidden by the time it starts, this way it would be just as if it were to continue what we started sunday, in terms of fairness.
        
        Reply To This
        
        Replies: 9
        RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
        
        by Virtual (100 posts) at 9/10/2008 6:20 PM
        
        Its like you said Tallas, you can enter the battle but you cant move troops.....
        
        Reply To This
        
        Replies: 8
        RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
        
        by Dougle (738 posts) at 9/10/2008 9:55 PM
        
        now windows up u may as well let us move men rather than hav it tell me my clan has been defeated
        
        Reply To This
        
        Replies: 7
        RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
        
        by Mart (125 posts) at 9/10/2008 11:01 PM
        
        Ye that was very mean to say!!
        --
        To B or not to B.. what a Question?
        
        Reply To This
        
        Replies: 6
        RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
        
        by Virtual (100 posts) at 9/11/2008 3:49 PM
        
        tbh in order to be fair armies should not move because it all died when we already moved troops and only battle window didnt start..... So let it like this and and lets us start move troops only when attack window starts
        
        Reply To This
        
        Replies: 5
        RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
        
        by Dougle (738 posts) at 9/11/2008 5:34 PM
        
        no i disagree as you have given people an extra week it should be used like an extra week
        
        Reply To This
        
        Replies: 4
        RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
        
        by Virtual (100 posts) at 9/11/2008 9:12 PM
        
        I disagree with you.... some clans were counting on 2 battle windows in one day, less time to move troops etc....
        
        Because of small trouble this battle should be played as nothing happened so it will be fair that it starts like I said in previous post....
        
        Reply To This
        
        Replies: 3
        RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
        
        by Dougle (738 posts) at 9/11/2008 9:15 PM
        
        not so
        
        as we can see the map we have time to plan
        
        therefore we should be able to move troups
        
        or not see map
        
        Reply To This
        
        Replies: 2
        RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
        
        by Virtual (100 posts) at 9/11/2008 9:20 PM
        
        well, you could see the map in those 15min between 2 attack windows, you could deploy then.....
        
        It would be quite an exploit to open the map now so people can move troops....
        
        Lets just say that time just froze hehehe....
        
        Reply To This
        
        Replies: 1
        RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
        
        by Dougle (738 posts) at 9/11/2008 10:11 PM
        
        that sucks ass i like to move my troups and not hav to count them by hand
        
        Reply To This
        
        No replies
        RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
        
        by Virtual (100 posts) at 9/11/2008 10:58 PM
        
        is it really counting or you are just pissed cause you cant get SAS that fast to help you with current state? ;)
        
        Reply To This
- Replies: 2
  RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
  
  by Tallas (17 posts) at 9/11/2008 11:46 PM
  
  The point is everyone had those 15 minutes in which to deploy troops, by locking it till it starts would be the exact same thing as if it were to start last sunday. You wouldn't be complaining if it went well from the first time.
  
  Reply To This
  - Replies: 1
    RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
    
    by Mart (125 posts) at 9/12/2008 5:06 PM
    
    i disagree because the situation is completely different then last week sunday
    nothing is the same
    --
    To B or not to B.. what a Question?
    
    Reply To This
    - No replies
      RE: Battle 10 America at War to be extended
      
      by Tallas (17 posts) at 9/12/2008 5:32 PM
      
      The situation is exactly the same. This topic seems to turn into a DJR - WoC fight, so let's not argue upon this and let the admins decide it.
      
      Reply To This